Archived Policy Proposals
The policy proposals on this page have been archived. You can see at a glance if they were accepted and adopted by the RIPE community or withdrawn at any stage.
- State:
- Withdrawn
- Archived Date:
- May 2013
- Working Group:
- Address Policy Working Group
Summary: This policy proposal seeks to redress the bias against the large number of organisations which require Provider Independent (PI) assignments of IPv4 address space by allowing End Users to receive PI assignments from the last /8.
Reason for withdrawal: Since the introduction of 2013-03, "No Need - Post Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup", it has become clear that the RIPE Community is heading towards full deregulation of the IPv4 assignment model. The proposer has decided that it is unlikely that the RIPE Community would achieve consensus on PI assignments from the last /8 without a requirements-based assignment mechanism.
Consequently the proposer decided to withdraw this proposal.
- State:
- Withdrawn
- Archived Date:
- April 2013
- Working Group:
- Address Policy Working Group
Summary: This proposal aims at changing the evaluation of the receiving LIR's addressing needs to a period of up to 24 months for transferred allocations
Reason for withdrawal: The proposer had initially proposed a 24-month justification to align with policies from other RIRs.
The proposer found the ongoing policy proposal 2013-03 "No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup" as being more in line with her views.
As a consequence, the proposer has withdrawn the proposal.
- Archived Date:
- April 2013
- Working Group:
- Address Policy Working Group
- State:
- Accepted
- Archived Date:
- February 2013
- Working Group:
- Address Policy Working Group
- State:
- Accepted
- Archived Date:
- February 2013
- Working Group:
- Address Policy Working Group
- State:
- Accepted
- Archived Date:
- September 2012
- Working Group:
- Anti-Abuse Working Group
Summary: This proposal intends to increase the transparency of the transfer market for IPv4 addresses. It modifies the current intra-RIR IPv4 allocation transfer policy in order to require the RIPE NCC to publish a record of all transfers conducted under the policy.
- Archived Date:
- May 2012
- Working Group:
- Address Policy Working Group
Summary: This proposal modifies the eligibility for an organisation to receive an initial IPv6 allocation up to a /29. This is in order to enable small LIRs to deploy IPv6 using “IPv6 Rapid Deployment”, also known as “6rd”, as defined in RFC 5969 in a manner that does not encourage issuing a single /64 to end customers when an LIR has a minimum allocation of /32.
- State:
- Accepted
- Archived Date:
- May 2012
- Working Group:
- Address Policy Working Group
- State:
- Withdrawn
- Archived Date:
- May 2012
- Working Group:
- Address Policy Working Group
Summary: The goal of this proposal is to allow IPv4 address space transfers between the RIPE NCC and other RIRs in order to supplement the pool of available IPv4 addresses.
- State:
- Accepted
- Archived Date:
- January 2012
- Working Group:
- Address Policy Working Group